Faroe Islands vs Rwanda: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate

Faroe Islands
0 % change on previous year
in 2024
Rwanda
0 % change on previous year
in 2024
Faroe Islands rank
88th
Rwanda rank
88th

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate over time

  • Faroe Islands
  • Rwanda
0200400600800197019972024

How they compare

Faroe Islands currently reports 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Rwanda, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Rwanda ahead.

Faroe Islands ranks 88th and Rwanda ranks 88th of 209 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Faroe Islands averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Faroe Islands Rwanda Difference Ahead
2000s -6.67 % change on previous year 16.39 % change on previous year 23.06 % change on previous year Rwanda
2010s 44.92 % change on previous year 60.29 % change on previous year 15.38 % change on previous year Rwanda
2020s 172.41 % change on previous year 17.38 % change on previous year 155.04 % change on previous year Faroe Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate, Faroe Islands or Rwanda?
Faroe Islands, at 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Rwanda as of 2024.
What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate between Faroe Islands and Rwanda?
0 % change on previous year, with Faroe Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Faroe Islands and Rwanda?
19 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
How do Faroe Islands and Rwanda rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate?
Faroe Islands ranks 88th and Rwanda ranks 88th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Faroe Islands vs Rwanda: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-annual-growth-rate/faroe-islands/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-annual-growth-rate/faroe-islands/rwanda/">Faroe Islands vs Rwanda: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 11,637 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.