Finland vs Papua New Guinea: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate
Finland
30.39 % change on previous year
in 2024
Papua New Guinea
36.6 % change on previous year
in 2024
Finland rank
34th
Papua New Guinea rank
31st
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate over time
- Finland
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 36.6 % change on previous year against 30.39 % change on previous year in Finland, a difference of 6.21 % change on previous year.
That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Finland's.
The two have swapped places 31 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1967 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 34th and Papua New Guinea ranks 31st of 209 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 1 and Papua New Guinea in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 7.83 % change on previous year | 83.33 % change on previous year | 75.5 % change on previous year | Papua New Guinea |
| 1970s | 1.16 % change on previous year | 27.34 % change on previous year | 26.18 % change on previous year | Papua New Guinea |
| 1980s | -0.0087 % change on previous year | 26.17 % change on previous year | 26.18 % change on previous year | Papua New Guinea |
| 1990s | -4.86 % change on previous year | -4.69 % change on previous year | 0.1725 % change on previous year | Papua New Guinea |
| 2000s | -15.62 % change on previous year | 43.25 % change on previous year | 58.87 % change on previous year | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 41.86 % change on previous year | 0.183 % change on previous year | 41.67 % change on previous year | Finland |
| 2020s | 5.34 % change on previous year | 18.81 % change on previous year | 13.47 % change on previous year | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate, Finland or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 36.6 % change on previous year against 30.39 % change on previous year in Finland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate between Finland and Papua New Guinea?
- 6.21 % change on previous year, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Papua New Guinea?
- 58 years are reported by both, from 1967 to 2024.
- How do Finland and Papua New Guinea rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate?
- Finland ranks 34th and Papua New Guinea ranks 31st of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.