Greenland vs Latvia: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate
Greenland
0 % change on previous year
in 2024
Latvia
0 % change on previous year
in 2024
Greenland rank
88th
Latvia rank
88th
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate over time
- Greenland
- Latvia
How they compare
Greenland currently reports 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Latvia, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Latvia ahead.
Greenland ranks 88th and Latvia ranks 88th of 209 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Greenland averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greenland | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 51.89 % change on previous year | 11.12 % change on previous year | 40.78 % change on previous year | Greenland |
| 2010s | -61.74 % change on previous year | 15.69 % change on previous year | 77.43 % change on previous year | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 % change on previous year | -3.89 % change on previous year | 3.89 % change on previous year | Greenland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate, Greenland or Latvia?
- Greenland, at 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate between Greenland and Latvia?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Greenland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and Latvia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Greenland and Latvia rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate?
- Greenland ranks 88th and Latvia ranks 88th of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.