Iceland vs Sweden: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate
Iceland
0 % change on previous year
in 2024
Sweden
0 % change on previous year
in 2024
Iceland rank
88th
Sweden rank
88th
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate over time
- Iceland
- Sweden
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Sweden, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 29 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 88th and Sweden ranks 88th of 209 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 6 and Sweden in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 13.78 % change on previous year | 5.34 % change on previous year | 8.44 % change on previous year | Iceland |
| 1970s | 3.43 % change on previous year | -0.2816 % change on previous year | 3.71 % change on previous year | Iceland |
| 1980s | -1.84 % change on previous year | -5.71 % change on previous year | 3.87 % change on previous year | Iceland |
| 1990s | 3.92 % change on previous year | -2.69 % change on previous year | 6.61 % change on previous year | Iceland |
| 2000s | 0.2412 % change on previous year | -7.44 % change on previous year | 7.68 % change on previous year | Iceland |
| 2010s | 0.0645 % change on previous year | 7.87 % change on previous year | 7.81 % change on previous year | Sweden |
| 2020s | -3.02 % change on previous year | -5.57 % change on previous year | 2.55 % change on previous year | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate, Iceland or Sweden?
- Iceland, at 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Sweden as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate between Iceland and Sweden?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Sweden?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
- How do Iceland and Sweden rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate?
- Iceland ranks 88th and Sweden ranks 88th of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.