Latvia vs Qatar: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate
Latvia
0 % change on previous year
in 2024
Qatar
0 % change on previous year
in 2024
Latvia rank
88th
Qatar rank
88th
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate over time
- Latvia
- Qatar
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Qatar, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 88th and Qatar ranks 88th of 209 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Qatar in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9.04 % change on previous year | -98.33 % change on previous year | 107.38 % change on previous year | Latvia |
| 2010s | 8.16 % change on previous year | 16.64 % change on previous year | 8.48 % change on previous year | Qatar |
| 2020s | -3.89 % change on previous year | 3.01 % change on previous year | 6.89 % change on previous year | Qatar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate, Latvia or Qatar?
- Latvia, at 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Qatar as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate between Latvia and Qatar?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Qatar?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Qatar rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate?
- Latvia ranks 88th and Qatar ranks 88th of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.