Latvia vs Russian Federation: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate
Latvia
0 % change on previous year
in 2024
Russian Federation
0.1943 % change on previous year
in 2024
Latvia rank
88th
Russian Federation rank
87th
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate over time
- Latvia
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 0.1943 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Latvia, a difference of 0.1943 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 88th and Russian Federation ranks 87th of 209 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 3 and Russian Federation in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -3.2 % change on previous year | -17.74 % change on previous year | 14.55 % change on previous year | Latvia |
| 2000s | 6.57 % change on previous year | 4.33 % change on previous year | 2.24 % change on previous year | Latvia |
| 2010s | 11.94 % change on previous year | 4.65 % change on previous year | 7.3 % change on previous year | Latvia |
| 2020s | -3.89 % change on previous year | 5.19 % change on previous year | 9.08 % change on previous year | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate, Latvia or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at 0.1943 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate between Latvia and Russian Federation?
- 0.1943 % change on previous year, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Russian Federation?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Russian Federation rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate?
- Latvia ranks 88th and Russian Federation ranks 87th of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.