Mauritania vs Zimbabwe: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate

Mauritania
0 % change on previous year
in 2024
Zimbabwe
0 % change on previous year
in 2024
Mauritania rank
88th
Zimbabwe rank
88th

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate over time

  • Mauritania
  • Zimbabwe
0200400600196219932024

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 19 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1974 it was Mauritania ahead.

Mauritania ranks 88th and Zimbabwe ranks 88th of 209 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 156.75 % change on previous year -3.7 % change on previous year 160.45 % change on previous year Mauritania
1980s 250 % change on previous year 65.18 % change on previous year 184.82 % change on previous year Mauritania
2000s 9.41 % change on previous year 10.23 % change on previous year 0.8227 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
2010s 7.29 % change on previous year 22.72 % change on previous year 15.43 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
2020s -0.7648 % change on previous year 78.3 % change on previous year 79.06 % change on previous year Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate, Mauritania or Zimbabwe?
Mauritania, at 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate between Mauritania and Zimbabwe?
0 % change on previous year, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Zimbabwe?
27 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2024.
How do Mauritania and Zimbabwe rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate?
Mauritania ranks 88th and Zimbabwe ranks 88th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Zimbabwe: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-annual-growth-rate/mauritania/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-annual-growth-rate/mauritania/zimbabwe/">Mauritania vs Zimbabwe: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 11,637 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.