New Caledonia vs Zimbabwe: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate

New Caledonia
0 % change on previous year
in 2024
Zimbabwe
0 % change on previous year
in 2024
New Caledonia rank
88th
Zimbabwe rank
88th

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate over time

  • New Caledonia
  • Zimbabwe
02505007501.0k196219932024

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 34 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 88th and Zimbabwe ranks 88th of 209 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 226.21 % change on previous year -9.74 % change on previous year 235.95 % change on previous year New Caledonia
1980s 80.75 % change on previous year 11.79 % change on previous year 68.96 % change on previous year New Caledonia
1990s 5 % change on previous year 4.66 % change on previous year 0.3355 % change on previous year New Caledonia
2000s -0.3453 % change on previous year -1.16 % change on previous year 0.8156 % change on previous year New Caledonia
2010s 13.42 % change on previous year 22.72 % change on previous year 9.3 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
2020s 0 % change on previous year 78.3 % change on previous year 78.3 % change on previous year Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate, New Caledonia or Zimbabwe?
New Caledonia, at 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate between New Caledonia and Zimbabwe?
0 % change on previous year, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Zimbabwe?
49 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2024.
How do New Caledonia and Zimbabwe rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, annual growth rate?
New Caledonia ranks 88th and Zimbabwe ranks 88th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs Zimbabwe: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-annual-growth-rate/new-caledonia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-annual-growth-rate/new-caledonia/zimbabwe/">New Caledonia vs Zimbabwe: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 11,637 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.