Albania vs Cuba: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Albania
2,139 t
in 2024
Cuba
2,528 t
in 2024
Albania rank
138th
Cuba rank
135th
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Albania
- Cuba
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 2,528 t against 2,139 t in Albania, a difference of 389 t.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.2 times Albania's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.
Albania ranks 138th and Cuba ranks 135th of 212 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Albania | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,231 t | 78,765 t | 77,534 t | Cuba |
| 1970s | 3,290 t | 119,180 t | 115,890 t | Cuba |
| 1980s | 2,980 t | 216,873 t | 213,893 t | Cuba |
| 1990s | 1,133 t | 74,800 t | 73,667 t | Cuba |
| 2000s | 456.1 t | 36,732 t | 36,276 t | Cuba |
| 2010s | 1,176 t | 40,411 t | 39,235 t | Cuba |
| 2020s | 3,613 t | 12,217 t | 8,604 t | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Albania or Cuba?
- Cuba, at 2,528 t against 2,139 t in Albania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Albania and Cuba?
- 389 t, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Cuba?
- 60 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
- How do Albania and Cuba rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Albania ranks 138th and Cuba ranks 135th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use with 124 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.