Algeria vs Malawi: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Algeria
26,700 t
in 2024
Malawi
27,426 t
in 2024
Algeria rank
78th
Malawi rank
76th
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Algeria
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 27,426 t against 26,700 t in Algeria, a difference of 726 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Algeria ahead.
Algeria ranks 78th and Malawi ranks 76th of 212 countries.
Algeria has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Algeria | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 14,447 t | 948 t | 13,499 t | Algeria |
| 1970s | 28,365 t | 2,934 t | 25,431 t | Algeria |
| 1980s | 34,953 t | 5,585 t | 29,368 t | Algeria |
| 1990s | 21,990 t | 5,200 t | 16,790 t | Algeria |
| 2000s | 22,320 t | 10,175 t | 12,145 t | Algeria |
| 2010s | 29,490 t | 14,888 t | 14,602 t | Algeria |
| 2020s | 26,700 t | 25,166 t | 1,534 t | Algeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Algeria or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 27,426 t against 26,700 t in Algeria as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Algeria and Malawi?
- 726 t, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Malawi?
- 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
- How do Algeria and Malawi rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Algeria ranks 78th and Malawi ranks 76th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use with 124 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.