Antigua and Barbuda vs Sao Tome and Principe: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled

Antigua and Barbuda
17 t
in 2024
Sao Tome and Principe
58 t
in 2024
Antigua and Barbuda rank
189th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
186th

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Sao Tome and Principe
020406080200220132024

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 58 t against 17 t in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 41 t.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 3.4 times Antigua and Barbuda's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 189th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 186th of 212 countries.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
2000s 15 t 42.25 t 27.25 t Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 3.4 t 49.5 t 46.1 t Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 10.8 t 66 t 55.2 t Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Antigua and Barbuda or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 58 t against 17 t in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2024.
What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Antigua and Barbuda and Sao Tome and Principe?
41 t, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Sao Tome and Principe?
23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 189th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 186th of 212 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Sao Tome and Principe: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-gaps-filled/antigua-and-barbuda/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-gaps-filled/antigua-and-barbuda/sao-tome-and-principe/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Sao Tome and Principe: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Unit
t
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 12,383 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use with 124 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.