Antigua and Barbuda vs Singapore: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Antigua and Barbuda
17 t
in 2024
Singapore
24 t
in 2024
Antigua and Barbuda rank
189th
Singapore rank
188th
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 24 t against 17 t in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 7 t.
That makes Singapore's figure about 1.4 times Antigua and Barbuda's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 189th and Singapore ranks 188th of 212 countries.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15 t | 17.38 t | 2.38 t | Singapore |
| 2010s | 3.4 t | 219.6 t | 216.2 t | Singapore |
| 2020s | 10.8 t | 25 t | 14.2 t | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Antigua and Barbuda or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 24 t against 17 t in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Antigua and Barbuda and Singapore?
- 7 t, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Singapore?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Singapore rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 189th and Singapore ranks 188th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use with 124 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.