Argentina vs Serbia: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Argentina
68,530 t
in 2024
Serbia
60,357 t
in 2024
Argentina rank
49th
Serbia rank
50th
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Argentina
- Serbia
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 68,530 t against 60,357 t in Serbia, a difference of 8,173 t.
That makes Argentina's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Argentina ranks 49th and Serbia ranks 50th of 212 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 35,502 t | 55,270 t | 19,768 t | Serbia |
| 2010s | 38,712 t | 48,689 t | 9,977 t | Serbia |
| 2020s | 64,500 t | 53,598 t | 10,902 t | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Argentina or Serbia?
- Argentina, at 68,530 t against 60,357 t in Serbia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Argentina and Serbia?
- 8,173 t, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Serbia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Argentina and Serbia rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Argentina ranks 49th and Serbia ranks 50th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use with 124 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.