Aruba vs Kiribati: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Aruba
0 t
in 2024
Kiribati
0 t
in 2024
Aruba rank
202nd
Kiribati rank
202nd
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Aruba
- Kiribati
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Kiribati, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 202nd and Kiribati ranks 202nd of 212 countries.
Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13 t | 1.75 t | 11.25 t | Aruba |
| 2010s | 24.1 t | 4.9 t | 19.2 t | Aruba |
| 2020s | 10 t | 0.4 t | 9.6 t | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Aruba or Kiribati?
- Aruba, at 0 t against 0 t in Kiribati as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Aruba and Kiribati?
- 0 t, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Kiribati?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Aruba and Kiribati rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Aruba ranks 202nd and Kiribati ranks 202nd of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use with 124 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.