Aruba vs Martinique: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Aruba
0 t
in 2024
Martinique
0 t
in 2024
Aruba rank
202nd
Martinique rank
202nd
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Aruba
- Martinique
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Martinique, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Martinique has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 202nd and Martinique ranks 202nd of 212 countries.
Martinique has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Martinique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13 t | 125.62 t | 112.62 t | Martinique |
| 2010s | 24.1 t | 204.6 t | 180.5 t | Martinique |
| 2020s | 10 t | 84 t | 74 t | Martinique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Aruba or Martinique?
- Aruba, at 0 t against 0 t in Martinique as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Aruba and Martinique?
- 0 t, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Martinique?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Aruba and Martinique rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Aruba ranks 202nd and Martinique ranks 202nd of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use with 124 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.