Australia and New Zealand vs Belarus: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled

Australia and New Zealand
533,669 t
in 2024
Belarus
496,895 t
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
12th
Belarus rank
13th

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Belarus
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k196119922024

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 533,669 t against 496,895 t in Belarus, a difference of 36,774 t.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 12th and Belarus ranks 13th of 212 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Belarus Difference Ahead
1990s 343,424 t 452,125 t 108,701 t Belarus
2000s 360,094 t 498,080 t 137,986 t Belarus
2010s 361,022 t 556,216 t 195,194 t Belarus
2020s 463,546 t 485,115 t 21,570 t Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Australia and New Zealand or Belarus?
Australia and New Zealand, at 533,669 t against 496,895 t in Belarus as of 2024.
What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Australia and New Zealand and Belarus?
36,774 t, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Belarus?
33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Belarus rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 12th and Belarus ranks 13th of 212 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Belarus: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-gaps-filled/australia-and-new-zealand/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-gaps-filled/australia-and-new-zealand/belarus/">Australia and New Zealand vs Belarus: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Unit
t
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 12,383 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use with 124 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.