Australia and New Zealand vs Thailand: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled

Australia and New Zealand
533,669 t
in 2024
Thailand
662,937 t
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
12th
Thailand rank
9th

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Thailand
0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M196119922024

How they compare

Thailand currently reports 662,937 t against 533,669 t in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 129,268 t.

That makes Thailand's figure about 1.2 times Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 12th and Thailand ranks 9th of 212 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 5 and Thailand in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Thailand Difference Ahead
1960s 146,369 t 6,692 t 139,677 t Australia and New Zealand
1970s 238,749 t 32,312 t 206,437 t Australia and New Zealand
1980s 246,414 t 80,161 t 166,253 t Australia and New Zealand
1990s 322,304 t 243,484 t 78,820 t Australia and New Zealand
2000s 360,094 t 331,675 t 28,420 t Australia and New Zealand
2010s 361,022 t 544,167 t 183,145 t Thailand
2020s 463,546 t 805,741 t 342,195 t Thailand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Australia and New Zealand or Thailand?
Thailand, at 662,937 t against 533,669 t in Australia and New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Australia and New Zealand and Thailand?
129,268 t, with Thailand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Thailand?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Thailand rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 12th and Thailand ranks 9th of 212 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Thailand: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-gaps-filled/australia-and-new-zealand/thailand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-gaps-filled/australia-and-new-zealand/thailand/">Australia and New Zealand vs Thailand: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Unit
t
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 12,383 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use with 124 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.