Australia vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled

Australia
401,451 t
in 2024
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
672,511 t
in 2024
Australia rank
16th
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
18th

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time

  • Australia
  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
0200.0k400.0k600.0k196119922024

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 672,511 t against 401,451 t in Australia, a difference of 271,060 t.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 1.7 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 16th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 18th of 212 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 4 and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
1960s 62,527 t 22,531 t 39,996 t Australia
1970s 102,857 t 44,603 t 58,254 t Australia
1980s 141,024 t 61,806 t 79,218 t Australia
1990s 196,964 t 164,815 t 32,148 t Australia
2000s 219,739 t 223,993 t 4,254 t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 232,492 t 389,127 t 156,635 t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 328,763 t 599,914 t 271,152 t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Australia or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 672,511 t against 401,451 t in Australia as of 2024.
What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Australia and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
271,060 t, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Australia and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
Australia ranks 16th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 18th of 212 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-gaps-filled/australia/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-gaps-filled/australia/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Australia vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Unit
t
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 12,383 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use with 124 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.