Bangladesh vs Belarus: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Bangladesh
591,600 t
in 2024
Belarus
496,895 t
in 2024
Bangladesh rank
10th
Belarus rank
13th
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Bangladesh
- Belarus
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 591,600 t against 496,895 t in Belarus, a difference of 94,705 t.
That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.2 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 10th and Belarus ranks 13th of 212 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 1 and Belarus in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Belarus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 103,144 t | 452,125 t | 348,981 t | Belarus |
| 2000s | 152,270 t | 498,080 t | 345,810 t | Belarus |
| 2010s | 369,971 t | 556,216 t | 186,246 t | Belarus |
| 2020s | 517,062 t | 485,115 t | 31,946 t | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Bangladesh or Belarus?
- Bangladesh, at 591,600 t against 496,895 t in Belarus as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Bangladesh and Belarus?
- 94,705 t, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Belarus?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Bangladesh and Belarus rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Bangladesh ranks 10th and Belarus ranks 13th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use with 124 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.