Bhutan vs Namibia: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Bhutan
237 t
in 2024
Namibia
343 t
in 2024
Bhutan rank
166th
Namibia rank
164th
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Bhutan
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 343 t against 237 t in Bhutan, a difference of 106 t.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.4 times Bhutan's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Bhutan ahead.
Bhutan ranks 166th and Namibia ranks 164th of 212 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 164.62 t | 169.38 t | 4.75 t | Namibia |
| 2010s | 196.1 t | 392 t | 195.9 t | Namibia |
| 2020s | 196.4 t | 239.8 t | 43.4 t | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Bhutan or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 343 t against 237 t in Bhutan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Bhutan and Namibia?
- 106 t, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Namibia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Bhutan and Namibia rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Bhutan ranks 166th and Namibia ranks 164th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use with 124 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.