Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Chad: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Chad
How they compare
Chad currently reports 10,941 t against 9,577 t in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 1,364 t.
That makes Chad's figure about 1.1 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 98th and Chad ranks 97th of 212 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 3 and Chad in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Chad | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6,000 t | 3,180 t | 2,820 t | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2000s | 8,552 t | 4,636 t | 3,916 t | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 10,181 t | 6,830 t | 3,351 t | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2020s | 9,083 t | 9,180 t | 97 t | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Chad?
- Chad, at 10,941 t against 9,577 t in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Chad?
- 1,364 t, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Chad?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Chad rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 98th and Chad ranks 97th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use with 124 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.