Botswana vs Kazakhstan: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Botswana
3,242 t
in 2024
Kazakhstan
3,000 t
in 2024
Botswana rank
129th
Kazakhstan rank
131st
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Botswana
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 3,242 t against 3,000 t in Kazakhstan, a difference of 242 t.
That makes Botswana's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Botswana ranks 129th and Kazakhstan ranks 131st of 212 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 136.62 t | 5,412 t | 5,276 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 410 t | 1,933 t | 1,523 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 931.2 t | 2,965 t | 2,034 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 2,061 t | 3,057 t | 996.4 t | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Botswana or Kazakhstan?
- Botswana, at 3,242 t against 3,000 t in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Botswana and Kazakhstan?
- 242 t, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Kazakhstan?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Botswana and Kazakhstan rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Botswana ranks 129th and Kazakhstan ranks 131st of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use with 124 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.