Burundi vs Jordan: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Burundi
3,686 t
in 2024
Jordan
3,515 t
in 2024
Burundi rank
125th
Jordan rank
127th
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Burundi
- Jordan
How they compare
Burundi currently reports 3,686 t against 3,515 t in Jordan, a difference of 171 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1969 it was Jordan ahead.
Burundi ranks 125th and Jordan ranks 127th of 212 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 1 and Jordan in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 15 t | 526 t | 511 t | Jordan |
| 1970s | 146 t | 835.7 t | 689.7 t | Jordan |
| 1980s | 405.2 t | 1,850 t | 1,445 t | Jordan |
| 1990s | 421.45 t | 2,683 t | 2,261 t | Jordan |
| 2000s | 389.4 t | 5,046 t | 4,656 t | Jordan |
| 2010s | 2,391 t | 4,422 t | 2,031 t | Jordan |
| 2020s | 3,686 t | 2,806 t | 880.2 t | Burundi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Burundi or Jordan?
- Burundi, at 3,686 t against 3,515 t in Jordan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Burundi and Jordan?
- 171 t, with Burundi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Jordan?
- 56 years are reported by both, from 1969 to 2024.
- How do Burundi and Jordan rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Burundi ranks 125th and Jordan ranks 127th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use with 124 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.