Cabo Verde vs Faroe Islands: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Cabo Verde
31 t
in 2024
Faroe Islands
17 t
in 2024
Cabo Verde rank
187th
Faroe Islands rank
189th
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Cabo Verde
- Faroe Islands
How they compare
Cabo Verde currently reports 31 t against 17 t in Faroe Islands, a difference of 14 t.
That makes Cabo Verde's figure about 1.8 times Faroe Islands's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Faroe Islands ahead.
Cabo Verde ranks 187th and Faroe Islands ranks 189th of 212 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cabo Verde averaged higher in 1 and Faroe Islands in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Faroe Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 22 t | 200.38 t | 178.38 t | Faroe Islands |
| 2010s | 8.9 t | 69.7 t | 60.8 t | Faroe Islands |
| 2020s | 31.2 t | 12.2 t | 19 t | Cabo Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Cabo Verde or Faroe Islands?
- Cabo Verde, at 31 t against 17 t in Faroe Islands as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Cabo Verde and Faroe Islands?
- 14 t, with Cabo Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Faroe Islands?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Cabo Verde and Faroe Islands rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Cabo Verde ranks 187th and Faroe Islands ranks 189th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use with 124 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.