Cabo Verde vs Réunion: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Cabo Verde
31 t
in 2024
Réunion
61 t
in 2024
Cabo Verde rank
187th
Réunion rank
185th
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Cabo Verde
- Réunion
How they compare
Réunion currently reports 61 t against 31 t in Cabo Verde, a difference of 30 t.
That makes Réunion's figure about 2.0 times Cabo Verde's.
Across all 42 years both countries report, Réunion has been ahead every year.
Cabo Verde ranks 187th and Réunion ranks 185th of 212 countries.
Réunion has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Réunion | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 24.64 t | 4,694 t | 4,670 t | Réunion |
| 1980s | 38.19 t | 4,431 t | 4,393 t | Réunion |
| 1990s | 6.5 t | 2,000 t | 1,994 t | Réunion |
| 2000s | 19.25 t | 291.6 t | 272.35 t | Réunion |
| 2010s | 8.9 t | 59.2 t | 50.3 t | Réunion |
| 2020s | 31.2 t | 56.6 t | 25.4 t | Réunion |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Cabo Verde or Réunion?
- Réunion, at 61 t against 31 t in Cabo Verde as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Cabo Verde and Réunion?
- 30 t, with Réunion ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Réunion?
- 42 years are reported by both, from 1973 to 2024.
- How do Cabo Verde and Réunion rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Cabo Verde ranks 187th and Réunion ranks 185th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use with 124 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.