Cabo Verde vs Sao Tome and Principe: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Cabo Verde
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 58 t against 31 t in Cabo Verde, a difference of 27 t.
That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.9 times Cabo Verde's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
Cabo Verde ranks 187th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 186th of 212 countries.
Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 22 t | 42.25 t | 20.25 t | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2010s | 8.9 t | 49.5 t | 40.6 t | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2020s | 31.2 t | 66 t | 34.8 t | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Cabo Verde or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 58 t against 31 t in Cabo Verde as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Cabo Verde and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 27 t, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Cabo Verde and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Cabo Verde ranks 187th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 186th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use with 124 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.