Cameroon vs Czechoslovakia: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Cameroon
35,288 t
in 2024
Czechoslovakia
35,100 t
in 1992
Cameroon rank
67th
Czechoslovakia rank
68th
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Cameroon
- Czechoslovakia
How they compare
Cameroon currently reports 35,288 t against 35,100 t in Czechoslovakia, a difference of 188 t.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Czechoslovakia has been ahead every year.
Cameroon ranks 67th and Czechoslovakia ranks 68th of 212 countries.
Czechoslovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cameroon | Czechoslovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3,527 t | 357,573 t | 354,047 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1970s | 7,161 t | 606,813 t | 599,652 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1980s | 10,869 t | 536,643 t | 525,774 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1990s | 8,867 t | 150,867 t | 142,000 t | Czechoslovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Cameroon or Czechoslovakia?
- Cameroon, at 35,288 t against 35,100 t in Czechoslovakia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Cameroon and Czechoslovakia?
- 188 t, with Cameroon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Czechoslovakia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Cameroon and Czechoslovakia rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Cameroon ranks 67th and Czechoslovakia ranks 68th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use with 124 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.