Canada vs Russian Federation: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Canada
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Canada currently reports 835,000 t against 537,329 t in Russian Federation, a difference of 297,671 t.
That makes Canada's figure about 1.6 times Russian Federation's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Canada ranks 8th and Russian Federation ranks 11th of 212 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 3 and Russian Federation in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 332,718 t | 479,125 t | 146,406 t | Russian Federation |
| 2000s | 286,120 t | 230,616 t | 55,504 t | Canada |
| 2010s | 376,800 t | 316,150 t | 60,650 t | Canada |
| 2020s | 799,000 t | 515,001 t | 283,999 t | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Canada or Russian Federation?
- Canada, at 835,000 t against 537,329 t in Russian Federation as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Canada and Russian Federation?
- 297,671 t, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Russian Federation?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Canada and Russian Federation rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Canada ranks 8th and Russian Federation ranks 11th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use with 124 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.