Central Asia vs Mexico: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Central Asia
170,406 t
in 2024
Mexico
158,662 t
in 2024
Central Asia rank
28th
Mexico rank
26th
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Central Asia
- Mexico
How they compare
Central Asia currently reports 170,406 t against 158,662 t in Mexico, a difference of 11,744 t.
That makes Central Asia's figure about 1.1 times Mexico's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Mexico ahead.
Central Asia ranks 28th and Mexico ranks 26th of 31 groups.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Asia | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 65,894 t | 113,090 t | 47,196 t | Mexico |
| 2000s | 41,756 t | 206,890 t | 165,134 t | Mexico |
| 2010s | 79,078 t | 244,937 t | 165,859 t | Mexico |
| 2020s | 165,171 t | 201,522 t | 36,351 t | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Central Asia or Mexico?
- Central Asia, at 170,406 t against 158,662 t in Mexico as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Central Asia and Mexico?
- 11,744 t, with Central Asia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Mexico?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Central Asia and Mexico rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Central Asia ranks 28th and Mexico ranks 26th of 31 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use with 124 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.