Chile vs Congo: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Chile
5,510 t
in 2024
Congo
4,856 t
in 2024
Chile rank
111th
Congo rank
114th
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Chile
- Congo
How they compare
Chile currently reports 5,510 t against 4,856 t in Congo, a difference of 654 t.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 111th and Congo ranks 114th of 212 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 11,871 t | 1,461 t | 10,410 t | Chile |
| 1970s | 13,370 t | 2,690 t | 10,679 t | Chile |
| 1980s | 16,631 t | 1,184 t | 15,446 t | Chile |
| 1990s | 52,033 t | 1,053 t | 50,980 t | Chile |
| 2000s | 15,780 t | 711.1 t | 15,068 t | Chile |
| 2010s | 7,004 t | 722 t | 6,282 t | Chile |
| 2020s | 9,721 t | 2,954 t | 6,767 t | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Chile or Congo?
- Chile, at 5,510 t against 4,856 t in Congo as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Chile and Congo?
- 654 t, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Congo?
- 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Congo rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Chile ranks 111th and Congo ranks 114th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use with 124 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.