Chile vs Uganda: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Chile
5,510 t
in 2024
Uganda
6,166 t
in 2024
Chile rank
111th
Uganda rank
109th
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Chile
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 6,166 t against 5,510 t in Chile, a difference of 656 t.
That makes Uganda's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 111th and Uganda ranks 109th of 212 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 11,871 t | 787.78 t | 11,084 t | Chile |
| 1970s | 13,521 t | 762.88 t | 12,758 t | Chile |
| 1980s | 23,973 t | 24.67 t | 23,949 t | Chile |
| 1990s | 52,033 t | 447.8 t | 51,586 t | Chile |
| 2000s | 15,780 t | 1,673 t | 14,107 t | Chile |
| 2010s | 7,004 t | 3,128 t | 3,875 t | Chile |
| 2020s | 9,721 t | 5,233 t | 4,489 t | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Chile or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 6,166 t against 5,510 t in Chile as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Chile and Uganda?
- 656 t, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Uganda?
- 55 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Uganda rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Chile ranks 111th and Uganda ranks 109th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use with 124 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.