Congo vs Zimbabwe: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled

Congo
4,856 t
in 2024
Zimbabwe
4,509 t
in 2024
Congo rank
114th
Zimbabwe rank
115th

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time

  • Congo
  • Zimbabwe
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k196119922024

How they compare

Congo currently reports 4,856 t against 4,509 t in Zimbabwe, a difference of 347 t.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Congo ranks 114th and Zimbabwe ranks 115th of 212 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 1,461 t 17,190 t 15,729 t Zimbabwe
1970s 2,690 t 25,667 t 22,977 t Zimbabwe
1980s 1,184 t 29,684 t 28,499 t Zimbabwe
1990s 1,053 t 33,550 t 32,497 t Zimbabwe
2000s 711.1 t 20,797 t 20,086 t Zimbabwe
2010s 722 t 23,977 t 23,255 t Zimbabwe
2020s 2,954 t 4,156 t 1,202 t Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Congo or Zimbabwe?
Congo, at 4,856 t against 4,509 t in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Congo and Zimbabwe?
347 t, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Zimbabwe?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Congo and Zimbabwe rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
Congo ranks 114th and Zimbabwe ranks 115th of 212 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Zimbabwe: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-gaps-filled/congo-rep/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-gaps-filled/congo-rep/zimbabwe/">Congo vs Zimbabwe: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Unit
t
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 12,383 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use with 124 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.