Cuba vs Mauritius: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Cuba
2,528 t
in 2024
Mauritius
2,713 t
in 2024
Cuba rank
135th
Mauritius rank
132nd
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Cuba
- Mauritius
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 2,713 t against 2,528 t in Cuba, a difference of 185 t.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 135th and Mauritius ranks 132nd of 212 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 78,765 t | 8,042 t | 70,723 t | Cuba |
| 1970s | 119,180 t | 12,353 t | 106,827 t | Cuba |
| 1980s | 216,873 t | 13,070 t | 203,803 t | Cuba |
| 1990s | 76,630 t | 13,995 t | 62,635 t | Cuba |
| 2000s | 36,732 t | 12,019 t | 24,713 t | Cuba |
| 2010s | 40,411 t | 6,410 t | 34,001 t | Cuba |
| 2020s | 12,217 t | 3,218 t | 8,998 t | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Cuba or Mauritius?
- Mauritius, at 2,713 t against 2,528 t in Cuba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Cuba and Mauritius?
- 185 t, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Mauritius?
- 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Mauritius rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Cuba ranks 135th and Mauritius ranks 132nd of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use with 124 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.