Cuba vs Qatar: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Cuba
2,528 t
in 2024
Qatar
2,420 t
in 2024
Cuba rank
135th
Qatar rank
136th
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Cuba
- Qatar
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 2,528 t against 2,420 t in Qatar, a difference of 108 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1982 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 135th and Qatar ranks 136th of 212 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 199,836 t | 90 t | 199,746 t | Cuba |
| 2000s | 35,303 t | 968.88 t | 34,334 t | Cuba |
| 2010s | 40,411 t | 2,000 t | 38,411 t | Cuba |
| 2020s | 12,217 t | 2,378 t | 9,838 t | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Cuba or Qatar?
- Cuba, at 2,528 t against 2,420 t in Qatar as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Cuba and Qatar?
- 108 t, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Qatar?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Qatar rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Cuba ranks 135th and Qatar ranks 136th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use with 124 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.