Ecuador vs Mexico: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Ecuador
156,985 t
in 2024
Mexico
158,662 t
in 2024
Ecuador rank
27th
Mexico rank
26th
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Ecuador
- Mexico
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 158,662 t against 156,985 t in Ecuador, a difference of 1,677 t.
Across all 64 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 27th and Mexico ranks 26th of 212 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4,392 t | 15,777 t | 11,385 t | Mexico |
| 1970s | 10,649 t | 44,862 t | 34,213 t | Mexico |
| 1980s | 17,170 t | 80,992 t | 63,822 t | Mexico |
| 1990s | 31,661 t | 113,090 t | 81,429 t | Mexico |
| 2000s | 65,253 t | 206,890 t | 141,636 t | Mexico |
| 2010s | 104,962 t | 244,937 t | 139,976 t | Mexico |
| 2020s | 123,454 t | 201,522 t | 78,067 t | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Ecuador or Mexico?
- Mexico, at 158,662 t against 156,985 t in Ecuador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Ecuador and Mexico?
- 1,677 t, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Mexico?
- 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Mexico rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Ecuador ranks 27th and Mexico ranks 26th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use with 124 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.