Eritrea vs Tuvalu: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Eritrea
0 t
in 2024
Tuvalu
0 t
in 2024
Eritrea rank
202nd
Tuvalu rank
202nd
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Eritrea
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Tuvalu, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Tuvalu ahead.
Eritrea ranks 202nd and Tuvalu ranks 202nd of 212 countries.
Tuvalu has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.25 t | 5 t | 0.75 t | Tuvalu |
| 2010s | 2.4 t | 4.1 t | 1.7 t | Tuvalu |
| 2020s | 0.2 t | 1 t | 0.8 t | Tuvalu |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Eritrea or Tuvalu?
- Eritrea, at 0 t against 0 t in Tuvalu as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Eritrea and Tuvalu?
- 0 t, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Tuvalu?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Eritrea and Tuvalu rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Eritrea ranks 202nd and Tuvalu ranks 202nd of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use with 124 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.