Eswatini vs Georgia: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Eswatini
3,834 t
in 2024
Georgia
3,731 t
in 2024
Eswatini rank
122nd
Georgia rank
124th
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Eswatini
- Georgia
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 3,834 t against 3,731 t in Georgia, a difference of 103 t.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Georgia ahead.
Eswatini ranks 122nd and Georgia ranks 124th of 212 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Georgia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,677 t | 796.6 t | 880.4 t | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 1,931 t | 1,944 t | 12.3 t | Georgia |
| 2020s | 3,342 t | 3,559 t | 216.8 t | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Eswatini or Georgia?
- Eswatini, at 3,834 t against 3,731 t in Georgia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Eswatini and Georgia?
- 103 t, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Georgia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Eswatini and Georgia rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Eswatini ranks 122nd and Georgia ranks 124th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use with 124 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.