Eswatini vs Sudan (former): Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Eswatini
3,834 t
in 2024
Sudan (former)
3,750 t
in 2011
Eswatini rank
122nd
Sudan (former) rank
123rd
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Eswatini
- Sudan (former)
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 3,834 t against 3,750 t in Sudan (former), a difference of 84 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 21 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 122nd and Sudan (former) ranks 123rd of 212 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 3 and Sudan (former) in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Sudan (former) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 3,377 t | 70 t | 3,307 t | Eswatini |
| 1980s | 3,532 t | 278.4 t | 3,253 t | Eswatini |
| 1990s | 1,900 t | 600 t | 1,300 t | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 1,677 t | 2,392 t | 715.5 t | Sudan (former) |
| 2010s | 1,416 t | 4,350 t | 2,934 t | Sudan (former) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Eswatini or Sudan (former)?
- Eswatini, at 3,834 t against 3,750 t in Sudan (former) as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Eswatini and Sudan (former)?
- 84 t, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Sudan (former)?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2011.
- How do Eswatini and Sudan (former) rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Eswatini ranks 122nd and Sudan (former) ranks 123rd of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use with 124 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.