Finland vs Mali: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Finland
40,903 t
in 2024
Mali
44,592 t
in 2024
Finland rank
65th
Mali rank
63rd
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Finland
- Mali
How they compare
Mali currently reports 44,592 t against 40,903 t in Finland, a difference of 3,689 t.
That makes Mali's figure about 1.1 times Finland's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1972 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 65th and Mali ranks 63rd of 212 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 142,724 t | 1,524 t | 141,200 t | Finland |
| 1980s | 144,563 t | 3,747 t | 140,816 t | Finland |
| 1990s | 88,572 t | 6,960 t | 81,612 t | Finland |
| 2000s | 62,410 t | 20,068 t | 42,342 t | Finland |
| 2010s | 34,904 t | 18,218 t | 16,686 t | Finland |
| 2020s | 36,577 t | 23,842 t | 12,735 t | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Finland or Mali?
- Mali, at 44,592 t against 40,903 t in Finland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Finland and Mali?
- 3,689 t, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Mali?
- 53 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2024.
- How do Finland and Mali rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Finland ranks 65th and Mali ranks 63rd of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use with 124 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.