Jamaica vs Mauritania: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Jamaica
888 t
in 2024
Mauritania
837 t
in 2024
Jamaica rank
150th
Mauritania rank
152nd
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Jamaica
- Mauritania
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 888 t against 837 t in Mauritania, a difference of 51 t.
That makes Jamaica's figure about 1.1 times Mauritania's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1973 it was Jamaica ahead.
Jamaica ranks 150th and Mauritania ranks 152nd of 212 countries.
Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 6,904 t | 168.43 t | 6,736 t | Jamaica |
| 1980s | 7,280 t | 300 t | 6,980 t | Jamaica |
| 2000s | 852.38 t | 648.12 t | 204.25 t | Jamaica |
| 2010s | 1,734 t | 894 t | 839.5 t | Jamaica |
| 2020s | 1,240 t | 1,047 t | 193 t | Jamaica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Jamaica or Mauritania?
- Jamaica, at 888 t against 837 t in Mauritania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Jamaica and Mauritania?
- 51 t, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Mauritania?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1973 to 2024.
- How do Jamaica and Mauritania rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Jamaica ranks 150th and Mauritania ranks 152nd of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use with 124 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.