Kazakhstan vs Mauritius: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Kazakhstan
3,000 t
in 2024
Mauritius
2,713 t
in 2024
Kazakhstan rank
131st
Mauritius rank
132nd
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Kazakhstan
- Mauritius
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 3,000 t against 2,713 t in Mauritius, a difference of 287 t.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Mauritius's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Mauritius ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 131st and Mauritius ranks 132nd of 212 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5,412 t | 14,340 t | 8,927 t | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 1,414 t | 12,019 t | 10,605 t | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 2,965 t | 6,410 t | 3,445 t | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 3,057 t | 3,218 t | 161.4 t | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Kazakhstan or Mauritius?
- Kazakhstan, at 3,000 t against 2,713 t in Mauritius as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Kazakhstan and Mauritius?
- 287 t, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Mauritius?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Kazakhstan and Mauritius rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Kazakhstan ranks 131st and Mauritius ranks 132nd of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use with 124 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.