Kenya vs Sri Lanka: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Kenya
49,354 t
in 2024
Sri Lanka
50,054 t
in 2024
Kenya rank
59th
Sri Lanka rank
56th
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Kenya
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 50,054 t against 49,354 t in Kenya, a difference of 700 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Kenya ranks 59th and Sri Lanka ranks 56th of 212 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,622 t | 32,137 t | 30,514 t | Sri Lanka |
| 1970s | 4,783 t | 30,012 t | 25,229 t | Sri Lanka |
| 1980s | 8,190 t | 52,800 t | 44,610 t | Sri Lanka |
| 1990s | 10,360 t | 56,075 t | 45,715 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 9,906 t | 68,448 t | 58,542 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 29,288 t | 52,470 t | 23,182 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 39,424 t | 80,875 t | 41,451 t | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Kenya or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 50,054 t against 49,354 t in Kenya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Kenya and Sri Lanka?
- 700 t, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Sri Lanka?
- 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
- How do Kenya and Sri Lanka rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Kenya ranks 59th and Sri Lanka ranks 56th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use with 124 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.