Lesotho vs Mozambique: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Lesotho
690 t
in 2024
Mozambique
646 t
in 2024
Lesotho rank
158th
Mozambique rank
159th
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Lesotho
- Mozambique
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 690 t against 646 t in Mozambique, a difference of 44 t.
That makes Lesotho's figure about 1.1 times Mozambique's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 40 shared years of data; in 1985 it was Mozambique ahead.
Lesotho ranks 158th and Mozambique ranks 159th of 212 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 1 and Mozambique in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 180 t | 729.2 t | 549.2 t | Mozambique |
| 1990s | 1,459 t | 1,440 t | 19.1 t | Lesotho |
| 2000s | 765.2 t | 3,477 t | 2,712 t | Mozambique |
| 2010s | 343.1 t | 3,949 t | 3,606 t | Mozambique |
| 2020s | 380.2 t | 5,393 t | 5,013 t | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Lesotho or Mozambique?
- Lesotho, at 690 t against 646 t in Mozambique as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Lesotho and Mozambique?
- 44 t, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Mozambique?
- 40 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2024.
- How do Lesotho and Mozambique rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Lesotho ranks 158th and Mozambique ranks 159th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use with 124 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.