Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Poland: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
489,714 t
in 2024
Poland
375,704 t
in 2024
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
21st
Poland rank
18th

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Poland
0500.0k1.0M1.5M196119922024

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 489,714 t against 375,704 t in Poland, a difference of 114,010 t.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 1.3 times Poland's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Poland ahead.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 21st and Poland ranks 18th of 31 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Poland Difference Ahead
1960s 49,403 t 596,661 t 547,258 t Poland
1970s 125,587 t 1.35 million t 1.23 million t Poland
1980s 141,841 t 1.14 million t 1.00 million t Poland
1990s 174,475 t 358,987 t 184,512 t Poland
2000s 206,647 t 437,800 t 231,153 t Poland
2010s 344,164 t 501,240 t 157,076 t Poland
2020s 470,381 t 442,282 t 28,099 t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Poland?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 489,714 t against 375,704 t in Poland as of 2024.
What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Poland?
114,010 t, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Poland?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Poland rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 21st and Poland ranks 18th of 31 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Poland: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-gaps-filled/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-gaps-filled/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/poland/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Poland: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Unit
t
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 12,383 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use with 124 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.