Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs South Africa: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
489,714 t
in 2024
South Africa
312,403 t
in 2024
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
21st
South Africa rank
21st

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • South Africa
0200.0k400.0k600.0k196119922024

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 489,714 t against 312,403 t in South Africa, a difference of 177,311 t.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 1.6 times South Africa's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was South Africa ahead.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 21st and South Africa ranks 21st of 31 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) averaged higher in 6 and South Africa in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 49,403 t 68,933 t 19,530 t South Africa
1970s 125,587 t 121,966 t 3,621 t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1980s 141,841 t 135,143 t 6,698 t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
1990s 174,475 t 135,779 t 38,696 t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 206,647 t 131,164 t 75,483 t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 344,164 t 151,903 t 192,261 t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 470,381 t 259,461 t 210,920 t Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or South Africa?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 489,714 t against 312,403 t in South Africa as of 2024.
What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and South Africa?
177,311 t, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and South Africa?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and South Africa rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 21st and South Africa ranks 21st of 31 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs South Africa: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-gaps-filled/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/nutrient-potash-k2o-total-agricultural-use-gaps-filled/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/south-africa/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs South Africa: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Unit
t
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 12,383 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use with 124 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.