Malawi vs Zambia: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Malawi
27,426 t
in 2024
Zambia
31,266 t
in 2024
Malawi rank
76th
Zambia rank
73rd
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Malawi
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 31,266 t against 27,426 t in Malawi, a difference of 3,840 t.
That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.
The two have swapped places 18 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zambia ahead.
Malawi ranks 76th and Zambia ranks 73rd of 212 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 948 t | 2,029 t | 1,081 t | Zambia |
| 1970s | 2,934 t | 6,389 t | 3,455 t | Zambia |
| 1980s | 5,585 t | 7,336 t | 1,750 t | Zambia |
| 1990s | 5,200 t | 8,600 t | 3,400 t | Zambia |
| 2000s | 10,175 t | 21,156 t | 10,981 t | Zambia |
| 2010s | 14,888 t | 18,366 t | 3,478 t | Zambia |
| 2020s | 25,166 t | 32,486 t | 7,321 t | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Malawi or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 31,266 t against 27,426 t in Malawi as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Malawi and Zambia?
- 3,840 t, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Zambia?
- 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
- How do Malawi and Zambia rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Malawi ranks 76th and Zambia ranks 73rd of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use with 124 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.