Montenegro vs New Caledonia: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Montenegro
621 t
in 2024
New Caledonia
528 t
in 2024
Montenegro rank
160th
New Caledonia rank
161st
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Montenegro
- New Caledonia
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 621 t against 528 t in New Caledonia, a difference of 93 t.
That makes Montenegro's figure about 1.2 times New Caledonia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.
Montenegro ranks 160th and New Caledonia ranks 161st of 212 countries.
Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 589.75 t | 425 t | 164.75 t | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 526.4 t | 471.1 t | 55.3 t | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 572.2 t | 528 t | 44.2 t | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Montenegro or New Caledonia?
- Montenegro, at 621 t against 528 t in New Caledonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Montenegro and New Caledonia?
- 93 t, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and New Caledonia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Montenegro and New Caledonia rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Montenegro ranks 160th and New Caledonia ranks 161st of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use with 124 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.