Namibia vs New Caledonia: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Namibia
343 t
in 2024
New Caledonia
528 t
in 2024
Namibia rank
164th
New Caledonia rank
161st
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Namibia
- New Caledonia
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 528 t against 343 t in Namibia, a difference of 185 t.
That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.5 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was New Caledonia ahead.
Namibia ranks 164th and New Caledonia ranks 161st of 212 countries.
New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 169.38 t | 493 t | 323.62 t | New Caledonia |
| 2010s | 392 t | 471.1 t | 79.1 t | New Caledonia |
| 2020s | 239.8 t | 528 t | 288.2 t | New Caledonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Namibia or New Caledonia?
- New Caledonia, at 528 t against 343 t in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Namibia and New Caledonia?
- 185 t, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and New Caledonia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Namibia and New Caledonia rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Namibia ranks 164th and New Caledonia ranks 161st of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use with 124 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.