Nepal vs Rwanda: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Nepal
6,633 t
in 2024
Rwanda
7,357 t
in 2024
Nepal rank
107th
Rwanda rank
105th
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Nepal
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 7,357 t against 6,633 t in Nepal, a difference of 724 t.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1969 it was Nepal ahead.
Nepal ranks 107th and Rwanda ranks 105th of 212 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Nepal averaged higher in 6 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 157 t | 107 t | 50 t | Nepal |
| 1970s | 1,002 t | 127.4 t | 874.9 t | Nepal |
| 1980s | 856.2 t | 168.3 t | 687.9 t | Nepal |
| 1990s | 1,795 t | 200.55 t | 1,594 t | Nepal |
| 2000s | 911.6 t | 1,142 t | 230.9 t | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 4,126 t | 2,248 t | 1,878 t | Nepal |
| 2020s | 8,497 t | 6,483 t | 2,015 t | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Nepal or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 7,357 t against 6,633 t in Nepal as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Nepal and Rwanda?
- 724 t, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Rwanda?
- 56 years are reported by both, from 1969 to 2024.
- How do Nepal and Rwanda rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Nepal ranks 107th and Rwanda ranks 105th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use with 124 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.