Nepal vs Tunisia: Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled
Nepal
6,633 t
in 2024
Tunisia
7,969 t
in 2024
Nepal rank
107th
Tunisia rank
104th
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled over time
- Nepal
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 7,969 t against 6,633 t in Nepal, a difference of 1,336 t.
That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.2 times Nepal's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tunisia ahead.
Nepal ranks 107th and Tunisia ranks 104th of 212 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Nepal averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 77.89 t | 3,013 t | 2,936 t | Tunisia |
| 1970s | 1,002 t | 3,236 t | 2,234 t | Tunisia |
| 1980s | 856.2 t | 4,106 t | 3,250 t | Tunisia |
| 1990s | 1,795 t | 3,280 t | 1,485 t | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 911.6 t | 5,230 t | 4,318 t | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 4,126 t | 4,950 t | 823.5 t | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 8,497 t | 5,983 t | 2,515 t | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled, Nepal or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 7,969 t against 6,633 t in Nepal as of 2024.
- What is the difference in nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled between Nepal and Tunisia?
- 1,336 t, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Tunisia?
- 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
- How do Nepal and Tunisia rank globally for nutrient potash k2o (total) — agricultural use, gaps filled?
- Nepal ranks 107th and Tunisia ranks 104th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nutrient potash K2O (total) — Agricultural Use with 124 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.